Nokia X30
MORE PICTURES

Nokia X30

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • C
  • Carol
  • 3td
  • 14 Mar 2023

Hoova , 14 Mar 2023iPhone 12 will perform a hundred times better than x30 even... moreNope, it is not, cause that is in your dreams,from there to reality, there is a huge step to make😉.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • uuY
    • 14 Mar 2023

    iOS is all-together a different eco system. Let's not compare it with Android. Those who really like iOS there is nothing wrong to choose iOS.

    Those who can afford this Nokia X30 have plenty of alternatives like Google's Pixel 6a or upcoming Pixel 7a, Nothing Phone 1, Sony Mobiles, ASUS ROG Phone, etc., to name a few, for a bloatware free Android experience. Every phone has its own set of drawbacks to complain. For those who can afford more, have plenty of more choices like Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, ASUS ROG Ultimate, Sony Premium mobiles etc.

    This mobile is just a midrange device designed, priced, projected and presented like a flagship. But, definitely this Nokia X30 is not a flagship device. Nothing more, nothing less.

      • S
      • Sin
      • 0Rf
      • 14 Mar 2023

      Push, 13 Mar 2023This phone is way to expensive for what it has to offer. 49... moreIphone didn't even have flagship specs
      Only 6gb ram without any cooling for soc
      And even Small battery

      Are budget androids with 8gb ram have more ram then it lol and bigger battery

      Only cost sub £150 and last long then any crappy iphone

      come on u know apple iphone is 100% pure scam supported nope more like anti repair and limited os disabled when apple choose too turn off your phones

        • H
        • Hoova
        • TiY
        • 14 Mar 2023

        Carol, 13 Mar 2023Do you realise how old iphone 12 is and how much it was on ... moreiPhone 12 will perform a hundred times better than x30 even with downgraded performance, and it will be supported for longer down the line than the Nokia even if it's older. Isn't that funny?

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • uwC
          • 14 Mar 2023

          Push, 13 Mar 2023This phone is way to expensive for what it has to offer. 49... moreIf you like iOS you can go for iPhone 12 since there is 100 % guarantee that Apple will support their devices for a minimum 5 years from the date of its release.

            • C
            • Carol
            • 3td
            • 13 Mar 2023

            Push, 13 Mar 2023This phone is way to expensive for what it has to offer. 49... moreDo you realise how old iphone 12 is and how much it was on release in comparison? Anyway, what version of the device is at this price, and is it new? I know it is refursbisbed version 4gb/64gb most probably. Who buys such a device now for 500 euros, must be really "smart". The only updates that device will become from now on, would probably be to downgrade performance.

              • P
              • Push
              • xjH
              • 13 Mar 2023

              This phone is way to expensive for what it has to offer. 49k INR for this crap?? Oohh god. Even iPhone 12 costs the same with all flagship specs and Nokia is trying to sell this budget phone at such a high cost? Doesn't make any sense to buy this phone.

                • C
                • Carol
                • 3td
                • 13 Mar 2023

                Anonymous, 13 Mar 2023Some months down the road using X30 it's been fantasti... moreWe all hope that, they are a bit late at the party with this device.

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • ptT
                  • 13 Mar 2023

                  Some months down the road using X30 it's been fantastic this is simply a perfect phone I love it get around 9h screen on times pretty good I can recommend this phone to anybody no problem and I hope to see android 13 soon

                    • C
                    • Carol
                    • n@x
                    • 13 Mar 2023

                    Anonymous, 12 Mar 2023Well. I have nothing to say. Read it for yourself. https... moreSo, what, am i now supposed to read and trust two articles with already missinformin titles and take them as truth? I am not saing that there is no truth betwenn the lines, but also a lot of lack of accuracy, like they make confusion about what was actually bought, and what does hmd owe....

                    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/18/nokia-returns-phone-market-microsoft-sells-brand-hmd-foxconn

                    There you go, something worth reading from trusted sources. And even they are expresing the whole sale a bit falsely, because nokia brand was never sold in a matter that was owned by ms, ms was also only licensing the name for 10 years, as far as i remember. At the end, you can believe whatever you want, i'm out, have a great one👍

                      Anonymous, 10 Mar 2023Ya'll arguing for no reason End of the day, I'll... moreI agree. I am old school but HMD devices are a disappointment.

                        • C
                        • Carol
                        • n@x
                        • 12 Mar 2023

                        Anonymous, 12 Mar 2023My sentence reads as, "If HMD wasn't capable t... moreNo matter how you want that sentence to be reed, it is still false. hmd bought nothing from microsoft. The only company that bought something from ms was Foxconn, they bought the Nokia factories in china, i already said this like twice.... HMD LICENSED the right to use NOKIA NAME AND PATENTS FOR 10 YEARS, directly from NOKIA, microsoft has no involvement into it whatsoever... Foxconn also has nothing to do with what hmd and nokia signed.

                        You never wanted to start a discution that is out of scope of this comment section, i understand that, but when you state false claims and wrong information, i just can't help myself but to correct the wrong believes. If i would told you that this device is made by xiaomi that bought the nokia from foxconn, you would probably do the same, well at least i hope so.

                        Sorry, but i am responsible for what i say, not for what you understand. And i never said that NOKIA is a fake brand, or whatever wierd things you say there. Better read my comments again and again, but with a empty of conspiracy mind, or whatever you have there. The new android phones called NOKIA belong to hmd, of course, and they are Nokia phones made in conformance and guidelines and patents that belong to nokia, the "mother" company. If that upsets you and makes you think that nokia is fake, well, you are the problem, not hmd.
                        hmd is formed tough of mostly NOKIA ex employees, before the microsoft fiasco, so yeah hmd is not just a brand comming from nowhere but it has experience into mobile field, because it's employees have experience in this field. But that does not mean that they bought and owe nokia, cause that is not the case.

                        I have a hunch that you are a bit to young to understand what patents are and what a brand name means. Maybe that is where you confuse business with "fake something". Nokia mobile Patents are everything NOKIA innovated in the mobile industry, hack the whole industry was made by them. And believe me, there are thousands of patents. hmd has bought the right to use this patents for their devices and the right to use the name on their phones. In essence, for you to understand, this means: ex nokia employees have build another company called hmd that bought the RIGHT to build NOKIA phones for 10 years, straight from NOKIA NOT microsoft. Maybe this bothers you, you do not like the idea, but it is called business. And to put some fire on the wound: almost all, if not all mobile manufacturers, even chinese brands have licensed nokia patents to build their phones, of course not all patents, like hmd, but some very important ones. Like antenna design, camera algorithms, charnging safety and so on. Yes this includes apple and samsung too. Not a long time ago nokia sued apple and some chinese brands for patents infringement.

                        Yes, in theory it is possible, that nokia as owner of patents and name, has a sudden change of heart and wants, let's say, lenovo to build their devices in the future, well of course if lenovo wants it too, then hmd is out of the picture when the 10 years agreement expires. But of course that this is a far fetched posibility, and highly unlickely to happen as is very hard to think that nokia will betray hmd especially when they owe shares in hmd and sell hmd nokia devices on their official site.
                        More likely would be the posibility of nokia acquiring hmd and starting building "in House" devices, especially that hmd wants to transfer a part of mobile manufacturing in europe. But this is just a theory of mine, might never happen.

                          • C
                          • Carol
                          • n@x
                          • 12 Mar 2023

                          Carol, 11 Mar 2023And again, you try to escape. Does not matter, let's s... moreThere i go, now talking b...it too. Let's correct huge error in what i said. Again, no company will ever pay bills, wages, operational costs, materials and whatever other things from profit, profit is what is left from revenue after paying all of these. If they can't pay everything from revenue and it needs to go to the bank, it is called Loses. The often they come the closer is the compamy to bankruptcy. If the company operetes with profit, it means that it already paid everything and was still left with money.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • uwX
                            • 12 Mar 2023

                            Carol, 11 Mar 2023And again, you try to escape. Does not matter, let's s... moreMy sentence reads as,

                            "If HMD wasn't capable they couldn't have bought NOKIA from MICROSOFT".

                            This same sentence can be written as

                            "If HMD wasn't capable they couldn't have bought NOKIA brand license for mobile manufacturing and distribution from MICROSOFT".

                            In the first sentence the missing words "brand license for mobile manufacturing and distribution" are implicit like your implicit attitudes.

                            Why don't you check with someone you believe like your parents, teacher, professor or someone else (if your attitude permits).

                            Of course, the NOKIA brand license for mobiles was a second hand purchase of HMD bought from MICROSOFT and which is owned by NOKIA Corp.

                            To be honest, I really don't know how these transactions were made and its procedures.

                            Above all, as I have already told, l never wanted to discuss things which are beyond the scope of Nokia BRANDED mobiles. You wanted everything. If you think that I am wrong, so be it. If you feel that I try to escape, so be it.

                            Through your debate you emphasize that NOKIA is a fake brand which is used by HMD on purpose to seduce consumers. Also, you emphasize more that NOKIA is a name which is not built by HMD but, used by HMD by paying for it. Hence, you conclude that, we all fall prey to the brand name NOKIA which doesn't even belong to HMD (a small company as you say all the time).

                            Tomorrow NOKIA branded mobiles might become an illusion if NOKIA Corp., refuses to renew their license. I think you want everyone to say "NOKIA branded mobiles" instead of "NOKIA mobiles" since, there is no relation with NOKIA Corp., and HMD.

                            I am afraid that you might start another argument for using the word "built" saying that NOKIA is not a building or structure to be built.

                            Whenever I try to end our discussion, you drag me here again and again. But, as you've said discussions and debates are always healthy. It makes everyone to explore facts and figures.

                              • C
                              • Carol
                              • skK
                              • 12 Mar 2023

                              Carol, 11 Mar 2023And again, you try to escape. Does not matter, let's s... moreThere i go, now talking b...it too. Let's correct huge error in what i said. Again, no company will ever pay bills, wages, operational costs, materials and whatever other things from profit, profit is what is left from revenue after paying all of these. If they can't pay everything from revenue and it needs to go to the bank, it is called Loses. The often they come the closer is the compamy to bankruptcy. If the company operetes with profit, it means that it already paid everything and was still left with money.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • apK
                                • 12 Mar 2023

                                Anonymous, 10 Mar 2023Ya'll arguing for no reason End of the day, I'll... moreI agree

                                  • C
                                  • Carol
                                  • nWL
                                  • 11 Mar 2023

                                  Anonymous, 11 Mar 2023Just replace my sentence " For your information, n... moreAnd again, you try to escape. Does not matter, let's skip it... If a company needs profits to stay alive, it needs a change of who is in charge, or what it does for a living.

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • uwC
                                    • 11 Mar 2023

                                    Carol, 11 Mar 2023Of course everybody should learn like there is no ending an... moreJust replace my sentence

                                    " For your information, not only HMD but, every organisation in this world pay their bills using profits they make."

                                    with

                                    " For your information, not only HMD but, every organisation in this world can't pay their bills without making profits."

                                    Both sentences mean the same.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • uws
                                      • 11 Mar 2023

                                      Anton-, 11 Mar 2023Do you think someone is going to read that much text???Valid point. Accepted.